| Tactics and Substance in the 2004 Elections | GoogleNews: Howard Dean |
|
First they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you win. - Gandhi Syndicate VJ [XML] or track us via blo.gs VJ Archives
June 2005 ..
May 2005 ..
April 2005 ..
March 2005 ..
February 2005 ..
January 2005 ..
December 2004 ..
November 2004 ..
October 2004 ..
September 2004 ..
August 2004 ..
July 2004 ..
June 2004 ..
May 2004 ..
April 2004 ..
March 2004 ..
February 2004 ..
January 2004 ..
December 2003 ..
November 2003 ..
October 2003 ..
September 2003 ..
August 2003 ..
July 2003 ..
June 2003 ..
Howard Dean & DFA
Democracy For America
Sign up at Democracy For America Dean for America Blog for America The real "Dean Scream" Grassroots For America Winning Back America Dean Issues Forum Meetup for Dean Dean Nation Dean Defense Republicans for Dean Women For Dean Idaho For Dean Blog for Arizona Alabama For Dean Blog for Iowa Democracy for Virginia Seniors for America So Far, VJ $ Have Gone To:
Howard Dean
Richard Morrison Kalyn Free Jim Stork Kim Hynes Brad Carson Leonard Boswell John Kerry Al Weed Ginny Schrader Ken Longmyer Bobby Scott Tom Daschle Good Reads
ACT Blog for Victory
Act Blue Alas, A blog Atrios Back to the Kitchen Backup Brain Barack Obama Billmon Blogging of the President BookNotes Brad Delong Calpundit/Political Animal Capitol Grilling Change for America Daily Howler Daily Kos DCCC: The Stakeholder Demosthenes DNC: Kicking Ass Dohiyi Mir Fight for the Future/SEIU DSCC: From the Roots Electrolite Esoterically First Primary Blog Follow Me Here Ghost in the Machine Hullabaloo Hunter at dKos Interesting Times John McCrory Just a Bump in the Beltway La Di Da LiberalOasis Liberal Street Fighter Long Story Short Pier Mark A. R. Kleiman Not Geniuses NYCO at dKos NYCO's Blog/100 Days of Rwanda Of, By, and For Orcinus Our Congress rc3 Oliver Willis Pandagon Politics and War Preemptive Karma Rebecca's Pocket Red State Rebels Respectful of Otters Skeptical Notion (Morat) Talking Points Memo Tapped This Modern World Tristero Tucker Eskew Washington Note Good Government
Media Watchers
CJR's CampaignDesk
Fact-esque FactCheck.org Media For Democracy Reading A1 What a Pickler Wilgoren Watch Not Quite Big Media
Big Media
PoliticalWire
The Note (ABC) First Read (NBC) The Grind (CNN) Washington Whispers (CBS) MSNBC Campaign Embeds: Clark Dean Edwards Kerry Kucinich Lieberman Sharpton Former Candidates
Wesley Clark / blog
John Edwards / blog/ One America Committee Dick Gephardt John Kerry / blog Bob Graham / blog Dennis Kucinich / blog Joe Lieberman / blog Carol Moseley Braun Al Sharpton Value Judgment is a daily weblog written by two independent voters on the eastern seaboard of the United States. VJ will focus on the 2004 U.S. Presidential campaigns, including strategy, tactics, and substance. The authors supported Howard Dean in the Democratic primary. Accordingly, his activities will be a prominent topic on this site. Mail us: V at valuejudgment.org or J at valuejudgment.org Link to VJ: Powered by Movable Type 3.17 |
February 1, 2004Frustration
Some of us are beginning to wonder why we should even bother. Snippets from a recent rant found elsewhere:
I really honestly am starting to think that if might be time to let the country go to hell to teach people what it means for a country to go to hell -- so that they'll stop worrying so much about Bennifer and who gets voted off the island and start actually respecting intellect and being informed. It's like when your 4 year old runs down the stairs, and you keep telling them, "You're going to trip and fall and get hurt if you don't stop doing that ... "[To the author: let me know which if any link to use. :) ] Posted by J at February 1, 2004 06:27 PM
Comments
Although I have that same fantasy, I'm dreading the moment when millions of four year olds land on top of the rest of us standing at the bottom of the stairs. Posted by: JPoirier at February 2, 2004 03:18 AMExactly. My uncle tried to tell me I had to vote for whoever the Dem is because we can't have four more years of this hell. Sorry, I'm doing all I can to get my guy on the ticket instead, and I refuse to vote for Kerry no matter what. Not doing it. I will not vote out of fear again. It's Dean, or it's Libertarian. I am not responsible for the idiocy of the bulk of the electorate. Posted by: fish at February 2, 2004 12:09 PMDoesn't anybody else find comments like this -- like what we see from 'fish' -- frustrating? "It's my guy or nobody?" Really? "I won't vote out of fear?" Hey, I'm not ashamed at all to admit I'm scared of four more years of intimidation and the eroding of my rights (for starters). And casting a Libertarian (or Green or whatever) vote doesn't absolve you of responsibility. Benjamin -- I've been ABB since before I heard Howard Dean's name, indeed, since December 2000. If Kerry (god forbid) gets the nomination, I will push the little Diebold button next to his name (fat lot of good it will do, but I will.) However, it seems that the Democrats refuse to learn the lessons that disaffected Greens and independents tried to bestow in 2000. I can't blame people like the person I quoted and fish for deciding that their participation just isn't going to matter. I can't tell you how many times in various fora I've been told by Democrats to "Go away" and "we don't want you then." Me, a suburban independent with some disposable income and inclination to support Democrats. 'True' Democrats (from spokespeople Carville and Begala on down) have basically told me to piss off. You tell people to piss off often enough, and eventually they'll believe you and, you know, piss off. So, while I was angry with the Greens in 2000, after watching the Democratic party closely for the past many months, I don't think I'll be able to bring myself to be angry with third-party or non-voters this time around. In the words of Buffy, the Vampire Slayer, "Please, give me something to sing about." I don't feel much like singing right now. Posted by: J at February 2, 2004 07:59 PMI didn't say my guy or the highway. I said the only reason I am considering voting Democrat in the first place is because of Howard Dean, and if he isn't on the ticket I am not planning to vote Democrat. I am still voting, and I will be voting for the candidate with whom I most identify. If one of the other (non-Kerry) candidates makes it instead, I'll do some research and make a decision then. I am NOT a standard Democrat. I am an independent voter, and I make up my own mind. I just got back from Washington Dean HQ, and I will be back there tomorrow, and I will be at the event Wednesday morning. I'm mailing my family who are ABB voters and telling them why Kerry isn't maybe the best choice to beat the incumbent. I think Dean still has a great shot at getting the nomination and I am doing everything I can to make it happen. I am sorry if it offends you that I will not be intimidated by the spectre of four more years of this mess. It will truly suck for all of us if the incumbent wins another term, I know that, and maybe it's selfish of me to not want to vote for a man I think is a liar and a cheater who ducks every time a controversial issue comes up. But I am going to vote for a candidate whom I can believe in, whatever party he or she happens to be. I believe in voting for what I think is right, not what is expedient or least bad. I want to vote for what I believe is right and good, and that's what I'm going to do. In the meantime, I am working my patootie off for Dean and I am caucusing this weekend, with as many people as I can convince to come with me. Posted by: fish at February 2, 2004 11:33 PMI forgot to say, thank you J. That's pretty much it. I didn't vote Nader in 2000 either. I wanted to vote for Harry Brown (libertarian), but I didn't. One last thought: If I continue to settle for what I am offered, instead of holding out for and working towards what I truly want, then I will never get anything better. And I have finally made up my mind that most of 20 years of voting for the lesser of two evils or the least damaging option is enough. I want something better. Posted by: fish again at February 3, 2004 12:13 AMVoting for the lesser of two evils is sickening to me at this point, literally. And I know why the major parties do this -- it's precisely to keep the majority of the population FROM voting. Think about it -- if you want to control an election to the best of your ability and you have 100 people voting, it would be in your best interest to get 90 of them to stay home and stay away, that way you only have to work on ten people. So it seems as if I can either stay home, just like the party wants me to, or else vote for their anointed taxidermist's product, just like they want me to. Either way, I'm merely doing what I've been manipulated to do. At that rate, why not just pick whichever action keeps me from puking? It won't keep the country from sliding to the right and continuing along its slow slide to fascist destruction to vote for Kerry. All it'll do is delay it for a while -- and not very long, either. Slides like this usually wind up exponential after a certain point, which means we will buy ourselves about fifteen or twenty minutes of life by voting for the Democratic puppet. Posted by: Janis at February 3, 2004 01:36 AMIf Kerry gets the nod we will have plenty of time to have this argument, but I disagree with many of you. The time for purity of heart and support of the most ideal candidate is now, with our money and time and energy. If our guy doesn't get the nomination, in November it will be time for recognition of practical realities, namely that all the hundreds of appointments a President gets to make that don't make the headlines but affect people's lives should NOT have Republicans in them again for the next 4 years. Kerry might well appoint some of the same people Dean would have, or at the least he won't be appointing cracked theologians like John Ashcroft. The other argument that I find persuasive is that gridlock is, in practice, much better than one-party rule. But as I said, if it comes to this, we will have plenty of time to have this argument. Posted by: V at February 3, 2004 08:09 AMYou're right to a large degree, J, that most of us Democrats do something that I really -- really -- hate: say we want a free and open primary with representation across the board, of all stripes, and then work like dogs to get behind whoever the establishment favorite might be. Doesn't work that way with the GOP by the way, I assure you. From that perspective, it's not only a very real frustration for independents like you, but for staunch Democrats like me (not to mention it's just obviously "bad for business"). I don't like John Kerry any more than any of the rest of you. And when the primary comes to Virginia (Feb 10th, I think...), I sure won't be voting for Kerry, no matter what happens today (Feb 3rd). V has it exactly right (and said it much better than I could've). It's time for the Dean people to get up off the mat and do what they do best. But if by some chance he doesn't get the nomination, I will work very hard to get GWB out of office. I believe my country deserves that. Posted by: Benjamin at February 3, 2004 09:07 AM |
Recommended Reading:
![]() The Politics of Truth... A Diplomat's Memoir ![]() Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush ![]() Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror ![]() Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right ![]() The Great Unraveling ![]() The Great Big Book of Tomorrow ![]() The Clinton Wars ![]() Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat Subject to Debate: Sense and Dissents on Women, Politics, and Culture Living History The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton John Adams Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace ![]() |